Top 5 Changes to Delaware Child Support Formula, Effective January 1, 2015

The Child Support Formula used by the Family Court in the State of Delaware to calculate a parent’s child support obligation is updated every four years, with the most recent revisions going into effect on January 1, 2015. It is important to know how the Child Support Formula has changed to understand how it may impact your family situation. You can then make an educated decision about whether to file a Petition for Modification of Child Support, based on the most recent updates.

Every 2.5 years, either parent may file a petition to modify child support, seeking either an increase or decrease in the support obligation. If your child support order was issued within the last 2.5 years, a petition to modify child support may be filed only if there has been a "substantial change in circumstances" through no fault of the petitioning parent and so long as the resulting obligation increases or decreases by 10% or more. Substantial changes include changes to income, health insurance cost or availability, daycare or private school tuition, number of minor children ordered to support, or the number of other minor children to support. Leaving a second job is not a substantial change in circumstance.  

The Child Support Formula is a rebuttable presumption. Every new petition is initially scheduled for mediation, unless there is a history of domestic violence between the parents. The mediator will run a child support calculation, inputting the parents’ income and deductions into the Child Support Formula. If no agreement is reached, a hearing before a commissioner is scheduled.  The commissioner will take evidence on the parties’ income and deductions and run a child support calculation using the Child Support Formula, just like the mediator before him or her. Only in rare circumstances has the Family Court found that a parent has successfully rebutted the presumption of the Child Support Formula over the other parent’s objection and entered a child support obligation based on something other than the Child Support Formula.   

The Child Support Formula is evaluated and updated every four years, with the most recent updates going into effect January 1, 2015. The Family Court will use the revised Child Support Formula to calculate any child support order entered after January 1, 2015, irrespective of whether it is a Petition for Support or a Petition for Modification of Child Support. Here are some of the significant changes in 2015:

  • A parent now receives the same allowance for supporting one minor child who is not at issue in the support order as two or more children. The Child Support Formula has long recognized adjustments for support that parents provide to other minor children who are not of the current union. The Child Support Formula reduces the amount of available income a parent has to support the child(ren) at issue in the petition by taking into consideration other minor child(ren) a parent may have from other relationship(s). Prior to this revision, the Court multiplied the parent's available income by 83% if there was one other child, 73% if there were two other children, and 67% for three or more children. Under the revised Child Support Formula, a 70% adjustment is made for one or more other children.   

  • The number of overnights to trigger a "parenting time adjustment" for the support payer has been revised. Prior to January 1, 2015, a parent may be entitled to a 10%, 20%, 30%, or 40% adjustment to his/her support obligation based on the number of overnights the child(ren) spend(s) with the parent. The requirement for a parenting time adjustment has been simplified under the revised Child Support Formula to the following: 80 to 124 overnights per year for a 10% adjustment and 125 to 163 overnights per year for a 30% adjustment. The revisions allow parents more flexibility with the visitation schedule without fear of implicating the child support order. The revised Child Support Formula also lowered the number of overnights to establish "shared placement" from 175 to 164 per year.

  • The revised Child Support Formula eliminates "de minimis" orders of support in shared placement arrangements. In cases where parents have equal incomes and allowable expenses, no support is paid by either parent to the other. With near-equal income, the result can be a very low “net” order that one parent is required to pay the other. In light of the administrative cost of collecting and disbursing these amounts, and the minimal benefit the children derive from their payment, an obligation of less than $50 per month is considered "de minimis" and the Court will enter a zero order.

  • Every parent will be presumed to have a minimum monthly gross earning capacity of not less than $8.25 per hour, 40 hours per week ($1430 per month) as of January 1, 2015. Except for shared placement arrangements, a minimum order for one child is now $100 per month and two or more children is $160 per month. The "minimum gross earning capacity" is adjusted biannually to remain consistent with minimum wage.

  • There is no longer a requirement that the support recipient pay the first $350 of unreimbursed medical expenses annually. Except where parents share placement of their child(ren), the child support recipient was previously responsible for the first $350 of the child(ren)’s unreimbursed medical expenses each calendar year. The remainder was divided between the parties pursuant to their respective primary percentage shares of total net available income. The Court felt this created difficult accounting issues for parents with little added benefit. The revised Child support formula now issues responsibility for all unreimbursed medical expenses in accordance with the primary shares, as is the current practice for parents sharing placement of their children.

 

You should consult with an attorney to see if you would benefit from a modification of your current support order based on the newly revised Child Support Formula. The Family Court also provides an online tool to give you an idea of what your child support payment may be under the newly revised Formula.

 

Family fun at Wilmington Blue Rocks

As far as I’m concerned, there is not a better way to spend a warm summer evening than with friends and family watching a baseball game. From catching Cubs games on TV as a kid with my father and brother to attending Phillies games with my husband, first at Veteran’s Stadium and now at Citizens Bank Park, baseball has always been a fun, family-friendly way to bond with the people I love most.

That is one of the many reasons that the Yeager Law Firm has been a proud sponsor of The Family Section at Frawley Stadium for the Wilmington Blue Rocks since 2012. Section K is an alcohol-free zone where families can come enjoy themselves in a clean, wholesome atmosphere. We are glad to be a part of providing an affordable event that the whole family can enjoy.

Watching the Blue Rocks play right in downtown Wilmington unites our community and gives us something to root for. What I love best about minor league baseball is being able to watch a player’s progression from the single-A Blue Rocks all the way up to a Major League Baseball team. Watching others achieve their dreams is something special.  It makes you believe almost anything is possible. And with the Blue Rocks playing in the 2015 Carolina League Playoffs, we’ll have an extended season right in our own backyards.

See you at the ballpark!

Yeager Law Firm helps set new precedent for property division cases in Delaware

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Family Court in a ground-breaking decision last month in one of our cases that we believe will set a new precedent for future property divisions in the State of Delaware.

The background of the case

I obtained a default judgement on behalf of a recently-divorced wife that required her former husband to pay her approximately $11,400 in cash, in pertinent part, plus other obligations, to divide the marital estate incident to the divorce. Her former spouse refused to make the court-ordered payments and testified at the Rule to Show Cause hearing that he could not afford to make monthly payments, despite receiving $66,000 per year in disability income from Social Security benefits, Veteran’s Affairs benefits and a United States Post Office disability pension. The Family Court ruled in my client’s favor, finding her former husband in contempt of court because her former husband had sufficient disability income to make monthly payments to my client. To ensure that my client received what was due to her under the Family Court’s default judgment, the Family Court judge issued an attachment against the former husband’s United States Postal Office disability pension.  

Setting a new Delaware family law precedent

Prior to this decision, there was no question that the Family Court had the authority to divide the marital portion of a former spouse’s pension as part of a property division incident to a divorce, and it made no difference whether the employee was actively working, disabled or retired at the time of the division. The question presented here was very different: it was whether the Family Court had the authority to attach a non-marital disability pension as part of a contempt action to ensure a former spouse received cash for their former partner’s share of the attorney’s fees and marital debt retained in her name under its prior ancillary order incident to the parties’ divorce.

The case was elevated to the Delaware Supreme Court through an appeal by my client’s former husband. The Delaware Supreme Court ruled in my client’s favor on August 20, 2015, affirming the decision of the Family Court, issued by Judge Joelle P. Hitch on October 14, 2014.

What this means for future property division cases

By nature of this ruling, the Family Court may attach a marital or non-marital disability or retirement pension (FERS or CSRS) of a federal employee former spouse to ensure payment of the former spouse's financial obligations under any court order or court-approved property settlement agreement incident to a divorce decree. This Delaware Supreme Court holding gives the Family Court another method by which to ensure compliance with its Court Orders and may change the future of property division cases in Delaware. We will be keeping our eye on this trend to see how it takes shape in the coming years.

For more information on this case, check out the case ruling here.

 

Giving Back: Yeager Law Firm Helps Raise $24,000 for Delaware Families

I am very passionate about making time outside of the office to give back to the Delaware community, and it is a special day when I can combine my love for the law with my love of golf.  That is why The Yeager Law Firm is an active supporter of the Combined Campaign for Justice, an organization that supports the work of the Community Legal Aid Society, Inc., Delaware Volunteer Legal Services, Inc. and Legal Services Corporation of Delaware, Inc. In 2014, these agencies provided free legal services in 4,640 cases, helping 11,112 low-income, elderly, and disabled individuals or members of their families have access to basic necessities, such as safe, affordable housing.

One of the organization’s annual fundraising events is the Combined Campaign Cup, a golf and tennis tournament with a reception and silent auction. The third annual event was held on July 27, 2015 at DuPont Country Club with over 180 participants. The Yeager Law Firm has been a sponsor every year since the event’s inception. Since 2014 I have also served as a Chair on the Executive Committee, helped organize the day’s events, managed the silent auction, and squeezed in 18 holes with my friends and colleagues. Needless to say, there was not a moment of downtime!

It was well worth the effort. The Combined Campaign Cup raised $24,200 after expenses this year, with 100% being donated to the Combined Campaign for Justice. That is a $5,000 increase from 2014. We are so proud of what these funds will mean for families in need of legal representation in Delaware. Check out some of the photos we snapped that day:

We’re already looking forward to next year’s event which will once again be held at DuPont Country Club. If you’re interested in participating as a sponsor or team, please email me at julie.yeager@yeagerfamilylaw.com.